Sports Videos Online

Santo Versace «Grillo Ha ragione»

ubr vs beppe semifinale coppa del nonno

raccolta di firme popolare

The analysis of the Naudet brother's 1st strike footage. If someone asks you to see a video of the WTC exploding with no plane in it, here's your best choice. The Naudet footage is maybe the most diffused of all the 9/11 images so there is no possible question in regard to its "authenticity" - so to speak....as it is forged. My analysis here has consisted - as usual - in slowing down the video, check it frame by frame and occasionally crop (enlarge) some shots to view the fine details. (As ever, I have of course NOT altered one single pixel of the material ). I wasn't able to perform this analysis earlier as the 4 versions I had of this famous footage were not as good resolution as this 5th version I recently found. The graphic object diving into the tower appears to be transparent : I call it 'THE GLASS PLANE'. It really is a crass graphic insertion. No video compression will make a block of pixels change color entirely depending on the background it is cast against. But more, much more importantly : MAIN EVIDENCE OF MISSING AIRPLANE : We may observe that the visible (i.e. not covered by 1st explosion dust) right side of the tower remains intact until 6 seconds after impact . Indeed, we may see 30% of the (righthand) wall still INTACT for as long as 5SECONDS after impact. At the 6sec mark we see the ignition of the charges which eventually rip open the wide plane-shaped hole we all remember. As the explosive charges only manage to open a 130ft-wide gash, a problem arises for the perpetrators : a Boeing 767's wingspan is 156 feet. So, to fix this problem, the far right tip of the gash (representing 'plane's wingtip') gets penciled in digitally on the video to reach the approx160gash-width required to 'sell' the idea of a Boeing767 melting entirely into WTC 1. The inescapable conclusion is that NO LARGE PASSENGER JET (if anything at all - yet a missile's still likely) crashed into the WTC1 or - for that matter - WTC2 (see SEPTEMBER CLUES). On a final note, if this most publicized and widespread 9/11 video has been THIS sloppily forged, it appears there were whistleblowers within the forgery crew - or else that crew was quite simply an incompetent bunch. In my honest opinion, the plane/no plane debate is now over. Let's move on and see how this evidence can be brought to a court of law.